The leak of CCTV footage exposing Matt Hancock’s affair could have been part of a politically motivated plot to oust him, it emerged last night.
In a dramatic twist, it was claimed that a ‘highly successful’ anti-lockdown entrepreneur had allegedly offered the compromising images to a prominent political journalist five days before they were published.
It raises the prospect that the leak of the footage – which showed the former health secretary breaking his own social distancing rules – could have been motivated by opposition to his stance on Covid.
The source of the images has been the subject of fevered speculation since they were first published at the end of last week.
The CCTV footage, apparently from a camera inside Mr Hancock’s private Department of Health office, showed him kissing his adviser Gina Coladangelo at a time when hugging anyone from outside your household was banned.
The leak of CCTV footage exposing Matt Hancock’s affair could have been part of a politically motivated plot to oust him, it emerged last night
It had been speculated that the images came from a rogue security guard or ‘whistleblower’ employee at the department who had access to the footage and then contacted the national newspaper that published them directly.
But last night political journalist and broadcaster Isabel Oakeshott revealed she had been sent a grainy shot of the CCTV clip by ‘an anti-establishment figure with a dim view of politicians in general and a particular disdain for the architects of the lockdown policy’.
Writing in The Spectator, she described this person as a ‘highly successful entrepreneur’ who ‘would have relished his part in exposing Hancock’s hypocrisy’.
But she said she mistakenly dismissed the footage as fake and that the ‘contact’ who offered it agreed that the original seller was ‘probably a chancer’.
Miss Oakeshott is in a relationship with Richard Tice, a founder of the Leave Means Leave campaign. There is no suggestion of any wrongdoing by Mr Tice, who leads Reform UK, a party that campaigns to restore pre-Covid freedoms. He revealed last night he had examined the clip after Miss Oakeshott passed it to him but he believed it was ‘doctored’.
Mr Tice said: ‘The footage was doctored, there is no question. If you look closely you see a pair of hands when he is not touching her. It’s not his hands.
‘We saw that and thought something is not right. The footage came to Isabel and we both agreed it wasn’t right. The affair is clearly right but there is something not right about that footage.’
In a dramatic twist, it was claimed that a ‘highly successful’ anti-lockdown entrepreneur had allegedly offered the compromising images of Hancock and adviser Gina Coladangelo (pictured left) to a prominent political journalist five days before they were published
The footage originally came from an email account on Protonmail, a service that offers end-to-end encryption. It is understood it was first offered for sale five days before the story was published in a national newspaper.
It raises the prospect that the member of staff who leaked the clip may have used a politically motivated intermediary to sell it in a bid to cover their tracks.
Last night the company responsible for security in the building on Victoria Street confirmed for the first time it was helping the Department of Health and Social Care with its probe into the leak. But Emcor UK – which has provided security for sensitive buildings including the top-secret Porton Down laboratory – refused to say if any of its staff had been questioned or suspended.
The pool of security staff who had access to the CCTV footage in the Department of Health is thought to be small and there is likely to be a digital record of those who viewed it and may have been able to surreptitiously record it on their phone.
MPs and security experts have called for a police inquiry into the security breach amid concerns that the Whitehall investigation will not have the power or expertise to uncover the truth.
It raises the prospect that the leak of the footage – which showed the former health secretary breaking his own social distancing rules – could have been motivated by opposition to his stance on Covid
Labour MP Chris Bryant said yesterday it was ‘preposterous’ that the investigation was being conducted by the Department of Health, which ‘has no aptitude in this field, no experience and no powers – it’s bizarre’.
He added that he had no confidence the probe would uncover the truth and demanded a full parliamentary inquiry.
The investigation, which is being supported by Whitehall specialists from the Government Security Group at the Cabinet Office, will look at whether the CCTV camera installed in the private office at least four years ago had been tampered with.
Cameras used in the building are produced by Hikvision, a Chinese firm banned in the US over concerns that it could be used by Beijing as a spying tool.
The company denies the claim, saying there is no evidence that its data is relayed to China.
Former Met counter-terrorism detective David Videcette, who has uncovered documentation about cameras in the building, said yesterday the police should get involved if criminal offences are uncovered.
A spokesman for Scotland Yard confirmed that it is not investigating the matter.
r.camber@dailymail.co.uk