Widow is locked in scheduling row with neighbours more than £1m property featured on Properties Less than The Hammer

A grieving widow whose amazing £1 million house featured on Properties Underneath the Hammer is at the centre of a planning row soon after it emerged she and her late partner developed it more substantial than prepared, in the completely wrong direction and with an unlawful swimming pool.

Angela Vickers and her late husband Ian acquired a 4 acre plot and submitted strategies to demolish an aged bungalow in Hampshire and replace it with an oak-framed, 3 bedroom residence 5 decades back.

The pair have been requested to demolish the property after it was discovered to be in breach of its planning application, which includes being crafted in the incorrect area and obtaining an unplanned swimming pool. The choice was afterwards overturned but Angela stays locked in a dispute with her disappointed neighbours.  

The Households Below The Hammer episode on the BBC showed Mr Vickers creating the oak-framed property himself, complete with a ‘glorious’ swimming pool to the south, a patio to the north, a garage with an business earlier mentioned it, a hen residence and a backyard garden chalet.

Angela Vickers and her late spouse Ian expended £250,000 building their desire home but did not have right organizing authorization

Mr Vickers built the oak-framed property himself, finish with a ‘glorious’ swimming pool to the south, which did not have authorization to be built

Even so, the completed residence – found in a conservation area in Hampshire’s New Forest – has enraged neighbours right after it was created 4ft for a longer time than agreed, pointed in a various course and was in a various locale to the first options.

Neither the swimming pool nor additional outbuildings the pair developed experienced permission either, it has emerged.

The Vickers originally utilized to range the preparing permission retrospectively to include the swimming pool and the other variations, but these were denied and they were instructed to tear it down.

This was appealed by the Vickers, and in an attempt to take care of the predicament, yet another application was submitted and accredited to lessen the building’s dimensions in July this yr – soon after Mr Vickers had died – alternatively of demolition.

But the Vickers’ neighbours are – at the moment tough this acceptance and have called for a judicial review of the organizing method.

Mr and Mrs Vickers bought the plot and a single-storey residence in 2017 in Godshill Wooden, New Forest, Hampshire, just after the past owners received consent to change the outdated bungalow with a two-storey home.

On the Houses Below the Hammer exhibit, presenter Lucy Alexander claimed of the old home: ‘It seems to be far more like a glorified drop or a rundown vacation chalet.’

She warned that getting organizing permission for their property was likely to show challenging.

Following Ian’s loss of life, Angela continues to be locked in a dispute with her neighbours above the £1 million residence

The couple’s challenge was highlighted on the preferred BBC programme Properties Less than The Hammer

A lot of of the home’s features, including the huge swimming pool, have been not included in the preparing authorization

Neighbours later on complained that the household had been designed going through the incorrect direction and was more substantial than at first planned 

But Mrs Vickers boasted of how her partner was going to get more than the neighborhood authority. ‘I’m going to deliver Ian in and he is heading to allure them,’ she said.

When the show revisited the done challenge – in which a nearby estate agent valued the new house at £1 million – Ms Alexander admired the new constructing and was particularly impressed by the ‘amazing’ pool.

Mr Vickers boasted on the clearly show: ‘There are about 20 oak trees which have long gone into this property – all the oak framing and stuff, all the kitchen, doorways within and out, they’ve all been designed by us.

‘A whole lot of occupation fulfillment in the whole area, actually.’

Having said that, it didn’t just take extensive for area inhabitants to kick up a fuss.

Just after complaints were being submitted to the community scheduling authority, an enforcement recognize was issued for the building to be demolished.

Mrs Vickers, 59, who was left widowed after her spouse died aged 75, experimented with to resolve the scenario and managed to persuade them to permit her minimize the building’s dimension somewhat than knock it down.

But the Vickers’ neighbours are decided not to enable that be the finish of the subject.

Mark Atwill, a near neighbour statements he is specifically impacted by the light air pollution and overlooking windows.

He mentioned: ‘It wasn’t carried out considerately. It really is in the mistaken spot, and it’s the erroneous sizing. All this extra stuff was set in, like the swimming pool and outbuildings.

One of the couple’s neighbours in Hampshire accused Ian (remaining) of getting a ‘con-man’ after his death 

Immediately after grievances have been submitted to the local planning authority, an enforcement recognize was issued for the constructing to be demolished, but it has because been overturned 

The dream home changed this run-down cottage on the prepare just after the entrepreneurs were being offered permission to demolish it 

‘The home is chunky. I had dumpster vehicles driving up up coming to my house when it was staying designed. No person was advised about it until eventually the session period of time was closed. It just seems to be so odd.

‘He’s a conman who’s not around for the backlash. I don’t want to speak ill of the useless, but I won’t be able to think of a further way to set it.’

A male neighbour, who wished to remain anonymous, reported: ‘It’s not personal. The dwelling appears to be like awesome, but it should not be there.

‘It was like living near a warzone when it was being crafted.’

Raymond Clem, who lives on the similar road, wrote to the New Forest National Park Setting up Authority [NPA] to item to Mrs Vickers’ approach to decrease the house in measurement.

‘As an immediate neighbour of this software site, I am worried that I did not obtain any notification of it from the planning division,’ he stated.

‘Since 2016, this web-site has been mired in controversy, and a myriad of programs submitted have perplexed the matter.’

Mrs Christina Folliard, one more neighbour, wrote : ‘I am aware there is an ongoing judicial critique into the absurd past acceptance in which the authority u-turned their positions and dismissed all of the continuing damage this growth is leading to.

‘It’s encouraging others with comparable intent to establish regardless of what they want as the authority plainly has no capacity or willingness to reduce or solution these kinds of action, in particular supplied this is not the initial time these applicants have behaved in these kinds of as way.’

But one particular local, Mr Fletcher, explained: ‘A smart alternative necessitating remedial motion was attained before this year. Allow it stand. The a lot more change expected at Paysanne, the increased the disruption to my family.

‘The enforcement buy that necessary demolition of the new assets was wholly disproportionate to any hurt brought about.

‘All that Mr Vickers had accomplished was make a dwelling and a great one at that. There was in no way any subterfuge, the course of action was open up, and he invited all comers to occur and see it.’

Mrs Vickers declined to comment.