A Russian doctor reveals the difference between the “Sputnik V” and “Pfizer” vaccines against Corona

The Russian doctor and presenter of one of the TV programs, Alexander Miasnikov, responded to the allegations of some foreign doctors that the Russian “Sputnik V” vaccine against the Corona virus is “unreliable”.

The doctor confirmed, through his channel on “Telegram”, that he does not intend to join the discussions currently taking place about various anti-corona virus vaccines, to respond to the critics of “Sputnik V” in kind, saying that the American vaccine is “bad”, but he called on critics of the Russian vaccine to take a more objective look.

Myasnikov pointed out that the vaccine developed by the American company “Pfizer” (in cooperation with the German “Biontech”), was developed in only 11 months, which is a very short period of time, in addition to that its development was carried out on completely new principles, while a vaccine was developed. Sputnik V builds on innovations dating back to 2002, while its predecessors have been proven effective based on clinical trial results.

The Russian doctor called for an end to the “vaccine war” and to focus the efforts of specialists throughout the world on combating the deadly virus.

Source: Novosti

Follow RT on