Agency failed MI6 Britain, to make it clear to the Foreign Secretary that one of its agents operating abroad may have been involved in a “serious crime” until an independent regulatory body referred to him last year, according to the Guardian newspaper.
The spy agency was asking the minister (either Dominic Raab or his predecessor, Jeremy Hunt) to renew permission for the client’s activities. Six months ago, some “red lines” were sent to the client, who was a potentially undercover informant, by MI6.
According to the report, the agent was informed that if the identity of the client was revealed, this would lead to the “termination” of the informant’s relationship with the spy agency, but when the agent’s authorization renewed was requested from the Secretary of State, MI6 It “did not explicitly clarify” that “red lines” might have been crossed – until the Commissioner for Investigation Powers noted (IpcoMystery.
Many details were withheld from the account, which were highlighted in the commissioner’s 2019 annual report, and it is not clear whether approval was granted in the end, and all that was said in the report is that MI6 It responded to concerns about the mandate to “modernize” the State Department.
Human rights activists said that the disclosure and others in the report indicated that it was an agent’s work MI6 It was a mess. “While our intelligence agencies do vital work, this report is ringing alarm bells in its narrative of agents plunging into chaos,” said Dan Dolan, deputy director of Reprieve.
The agency has been seeking to authorize the client’s activities under Section 7 of the Intelligence Services Act, called the “murder license” whereby British agents working abroad are allowed to break any law without fear of prosecution in the UK if they obtain written permission from the Secretary of State to do so. Today.
The agency also criticized a companyIpco Of the way he deals with informants in the UK, although he is convinced that MI6 Managing “all agent cases appropriately,” there were questions about his handling of paperwork, including “inconsistent written evidence of supervision.”
Source link