Alleged witness manipulation jolts demo

VATICAN City (AP) — The textual content message to the Vatican monsignor made available forgiveness together with a threat: “I know everything about you … and I keep it all in my archives,” it read. “I pardon you, Perlasca, but keep in mind, you owe me a favor.”

The concept was one particular of more than 100 freshly unveiled WhatsApp texts and other correspondence entered into proof at the Vatican courthouse final week that have jolted a economical crimes demo involving the Holy See’s income-losing financial commitment in a London property.

The texts have forged question on the believability of a important suspect-turned-prosecution witness and lifted inquiries about the integrity of the investigation into the London deal and other transactions.

Collectively with evidence that a cardinal secretly recorded Pope Francis, they confirmed that a demo originally aimed at highlighting Francis’ monetary reforms has turn out to be a Pandora’s Box of unintended revelations about Vatican vendettas and scheming.

The demo in the metropolis-state’s legal tribunal originated in the Holy See’s 350 million-euro financial commitment to produce a previous warehouse for department retail outlet Harrods into luxurious flats.

Prosecutors have accused 10 individuals in the case, alleging Vatican monsignors and brokers fleeced the Holy See of tens of millions of euros in expenses and commissions, and then extorted the Holy See of 15 million euros to get complete control of the assets.

Monsignor Alberto Perlasca at first was between the primary suspects. As the Vatican official who managed the secretariat of state’s 600 million-euro asset portfolio, he was intimately concerned in the house deal.

But Perlasca adjusted his tale in August 2020 and started off cooperating with prosecutors, blaming his deputy and his remarkable, Cardinal Angelo Becciu, then the No. 2 in the secretariat of point out, for the London investment decision and other questionable expenditures.

Each the deputy and Becciu are on trial. Perlasca is not, and his statements to prosecutors became a resource of qualified prospects that shaped the foundation of many rates in the indictment.

Story proceeds

When Perlasca testified for the prosecution very last week, some of his promises collapsed less than defense questioning. Judge Giuseppe Pignatone gave Perlasca until eventually midweek to don’t forget who assisted him generate his initially tell-all memo on Aug. 31, 2020.

And then came a bombshell, courtesy of the textual content messages that the prosecutor was compelled to introduce into proof after he acquired them. They proposed Perlasca wrote the memo implicating his boss immediately after he had been given threats and tips from a girl who had an ax to grind versus Becciu.

Public relations professional Francesca Chaouqui beforehand served on a papal commission tasked with investigating the Vatican’s wide and murky financials. She is identified in Vatican circles for her position in the “Vatileaks” scandal of 2015-2016, when she was convicted of conspiring to leak confidential Vatican files to journalists and been given a 10-thirty day period suspended sentence.

According to the texts, Chaouqui nurtured a grudge in opposition to Becciu, whom she blamed for allegedly supporting her prosecution. She evidently noticed the investigation into the London genuine estate enterprise as a likelihood to settle scores and implicate Becciu in alleged wrongdoing she had uncovered during her commission times.

“I understood that sooner or afterwards the instant would come and I would send out you this message,” Chaouqui wrote Perlasca on May 12, 2020. “Because the Lord doesn’t permit the very good to be humiliated without having mend. I pardon you Perlasca, but don’t forget, you owe me a favor.”

Chaouqui did not say what she desired. But other messages unveiled in court docket suggest she persuaded a Perlasca family friend and confidante, Genoveffa Ciferri, that she could help Perlasca stay clear of prosecution if he adopted Chaouqui’s assistance.

According to Ciferri’s texts, the elaborate plan allegedly unfolded as follows: Ciferri considered Chaouqui when she bragged that she was performing hand-in-hand with Vatican prosecutors, gendarmes and the pope in the criminal investigation. Ciferri wished to aid Perlasca, and so fed him Chaouqui’s information anonymously.

Chaouqui subsequently organized a dinner at a Rome cafe all through which Perlasca attempted to extract incriminating information from Becciu. Perlasca was led to consider the Vatican prosecutors experienced bugged the desk and were being recording their dialogue, though no recording has materialized. He supplied them with a in-depth memo soon after the Sept. 6, 2020 food.

The meal took area 18 days in advance of Francis fired Becciu and stripped him of his legal rights as a cardinal based on info he claimed he had received about Becciu’s alleged fiscal misconduct.

Ciferri confessed the complete saga to prosecutor Alessandro Diddi in a Nov. 26 textual content in which she explained she experienced schemed with Chaouqui in hopes of sparing Perlasca from turning out to be a prison defendant. Ciferri forwarded Diddi 126 textual content messages she exchanged with Chaouqui and stated Chaouqui had aided craft the August 2020 memo in which Perlasca turned on the cardinal.

The implications of Chaouqui’s alleged interference were being obvious to those in the courtroom: Perlasca, a critical prosecution witness, may perhaps have been persuaded to deliver possibly untrue testimony about Becciu and others by someone with a not-so-hidden agenda. In addition, Chaouqui bragged about performing closely with investigators on the circumstance.

Becciu’s law firm, Fabio Viglione, denounced the “surreal” machinations that served guide to his client’s indictment, expressing Perlasca had been manipulated “to the detriment of the real truth, the authenticity of the investigation and the honorability of His Eminence.”

Cataldo Intrieri, the attorney representing Perlasca’s deputy Fabrizio Tirabassi, claimed the revelations warrant the trial’s suspension and the opening of a new felony investigation for suspected fraud, threats and obstruction. “Regardless, there are implications for the points that are the matter of this demo,” Intrieri said.

Decide Pignatone turned down protection calls to suspend the trial, saying the proceedings were dependent much more on documentation about the London offer than Perlasca’s testimony. But he scheduled in-court docket interrogations for Ciferri and Chaouqui.

Chaouqui, when arrived at by The Related Push, declined to remark in advance of her court testimony.

Diddi defended the investigation, strongly denied acquiring any dealings with Chaouqui in advance of she was questioned in July and announced he had opened a new investigation into feasible bogus testimony and other prospective crimes based mostly on the texts he acquired from Ciferri. He made available to change around his cell cellphone to exhibit he experienced no dealings with Chaouqui.

“If another person brags about getting understanding (of the investigation) I have to examine,” he reported.

Some protection legal professionals also privately complained that Diddi experienced evidence in February 2021 of Chaouqui’s alleged involvement with Perlasca but failed to inform the protection, section of broader defense complaints about the peculiarities of the Vatican’s legal process. Diddi acknowledged very last week that Ciferri telephone him on Feb. 4, 2021 and pointed out Chaouqui’s name.

Diddi also heard from Perlasca on March 1, 2022, when the monsignor submitted a formal grievance alleging Chaouqui experienced threatened him and claimed to be performing with prosecutors. The penned grievance was only entered into proof previous week. Protection lawyers explained it was their very first inkling that Perlasca may well be a compromised prosecution witness.

“She sent me threatening messages by way of telephone, expressing I was in her palms and that only she could conserve me from particular jail, earning clear she could impact the investigators,” Perlasca wrote in his complaint.

Chaouqui was in touch with Perlasca as lately as Nov. 26. She texted him soon after his to start with court appearances and prompt they meet up with prior to he went again on the stand.

“My fascination, and I assume yours, is that my assist not emerge at demo due to the fact it would be hard to make clear above all the outcomes that it experienced,” she wrote.