Military experts and analysts agreed that Palestinian resistance messages were represented in the speeches of spokesman Abu Ubaida Izz al-Din al-Qassam BrigadesThe military wing of the Islamic Resistance Movement (agitationThe announced operations reflect clear confidence in its capabilities and ability, and the ability to impose its conditions during the negotiation process to reach a deal with the Israeli occupation.
Abu Ubaida had said, in his last recorded speech on Monday evening, that Al-Qassam fighters had destroyed 60 Israeli military vehicles during the past 72 hours, and it was likely that Israel had bombed its forces on the ground, thinking that a number of its soldiers had been captured, revealing that specific operations had been carried out and that many had been captured. Occupation soldiers killed and wounded.
Professor of Political Science at the Arab American University, Ayman Youssef, found in the last speech of the Al-Qassam spokesman, “high and enormous confidence” that appeared through the tone of his voice and the numbers, details, and data he presented, which showed a clear comfort in transitioning between tactics and strategy, and reflected a distinguished performance on the field. land, and surprise the enemy with qualitative operations.
He saw – in his speech during the analytical pause on Al Jazeera channel “Gaza…what next” – that the resistance strategy will intensify with time, and he expected that its achievements would increase if the Israeli occupation forces penetrated further, especially in the Zaytoun area, which is known to be one of the important strongholds of the Palestinian resistance, and that it It will cause them huge losses.
Clear message
The professor of political science also considered, in Abu Ubaida’s speech, a clear message that the resistance has what enables it to impose its conditions on the negotiating table regarding a deal for a truce, ceasefire, and prisoner exchange, in light of the escalation of talk about getting close to reaching it, and that the Israeli and American vision will not be the same. specified for this transaction.
Dr. Ayman Youssef believes that there is a clear harmony between the tactical and strategic field of the resistance on the ground, and the political track in the context of the negotiations, and the aspect of the popular incubator was not overlooked, as Abu Ubaida’s speech contained a message supporting their steadfastness and steadfastness in the face of the brutal Israeli aggression.
In turn, the military expert, Fayez Al-Duwairi, saw that the resistance’s performance and what appeared in Abu Ubaida’s speech indicate that the resistance is sending a message that it is not in the position of being dictated to any agreement or deal, given its ability to withstand and inflict losses on its enemy, and that it is determined to reach a solution. To a deal that meets its conditions and aspirations.
He pointed out that the places mentioned by Abu Ubaida in his speech are areas that the occupation forces have invaded since the beginning of the ground operation in Gaza stripHence, this confirms that there are no areas under its control yet, in light of the continuing clashes and the resistance’s ability to carry out operations in them.
Important development
Abu Ubaida’s talk about a large group (25 fighters) carrying out an operation was considered a noteworthy development, given that the majority of operations were carried out by small groups (3 to 5 members), which reveals a high ability to manage the battle and confirms that its strings are still in the hands of the resistance. .
Al-Duwairi expected that the next stage will witness an increase in the resistance’s implementation of selective and specific operations deep into areas of the Israeli presence, and the continuation of confrontational battles.
Regarding the impact of Abu Ubaida’s speeches on the people of Gaza, the political analyst from the Gaza Strip, Yasser Abuhin, confirmed that they have become an essential part of the people of the Gaza Strip’s follow-up of the course of events, despite the difficulty of doing so in light of the deteriorating humanitarian conditions, because of their moral and psychological dimension.
In this context, he pointed out that the displaced people in hospitals and schools and those who remained in their homes are keen to listen to the speech despite the power and Internet outages, and they strive to achieve this through whatever capabilities they have.
