Disgraced cheating cyclist Lance Armstrong was so good he could have won the Tour de France even without drugs, legendary commentator Phil Liggett claims
- Phil Liggett believes a clean Lance Armstrong would have won Tour de France
- US cyclist won world famous race seven years in a row between 1999 and 2005
- Admitted in 2013 he took performance-enhancing drugs for most of his career
- Once a fierce supporter, Liggett says Armstrong was ‘naturally extremely good’
Disgraced cycling champion Lance Armstrong was so good he would have won the Tour de France without drugs, legendary commentator Phil Liggett claims.
The American doping cheat admitted in 2013 he systematically took performance-enhancing drugs for most of his career in an infamous tell-all interview with talk show host Oprah Winfrey.
Armstrong was the only cyclist to ever win seven consecutive titles between 1999 and 2005, which now have no official winner following the doping revelations.
Liggett, 77, didn’t hesitate when asked if Armstrong could have won the world’s most famous cycling race without drugs in his comeback from testicular cancer in 1996.
Disgraced cycling champion Lance Armstrong (pictured in 2002) won seven Tour de France titles before admitting to taking performance enhacing drugs during his career
‘No question,’ Liggett told Seven News. ‘He was naturally just extremely good… Don’t forget he was racing against other drug users.’
Liggett claimed most of Armstrong’s team were also forced to take drugs ‘because Lance was exceptional’.
‘When Lance realised that the Tour de France was drug-ridden, he told his team “we’ll do it and we’ll do it better than they do it”,’ he added.
‘And if they didn’t agree, they were off the team.’
Liggett fiercely defended the road cycling great when the doping allegations first emerged until Armstrong made the startling admission several years later.
He hadn’t spoken to the disgraced champion since 2011 until two years ago while Armstrong was providing commentary for the Tour de France via American TV network NBC.
Commentator Phil Liggett (pictured) believes Armstrong was so good who would have won the Tour de France without drugs
Liggett doesn’t hate Armstrong and still admires him for his US$600 million fundraising efforts for cancer.
‘I admired him for his achievements but I can’t condone drug cheats, it’s not for me, I just can’t do that,’ he said.
In a recent interview with the Sydney Morning Herald, Liggett hailed Armstrong as ‘probably the most gifted cyclist of his time’ but admitted he was glad when they caught him.
‘Drugs, as I always say, don’t turn a donkey into a thoroughbred,’ he said.
‘They just make you 10 per cent better. But the mentality of Lance, that’s why he beat cancer. He was so much stronger than the average person.’
Lance Armstrong salutes the crowd after winning the 2005 Tour de France for the seventh consecutive time following his battle with testicular cancer
Liggett doesn’t hate Armstrong and still admires him for his US$600 million fundraising efforts for cancer
Liggett also opened up his awkward encounter with Armstrong while commentating together on the 2019 Tour de France.
The encounter came months after the sudden death of Liggett’s long-time co-commentator and former cycling champion Paul Sherwen.
‘Lance came up in the break [and I said] ‘Hi Lance’,’ he recalled.
‘He goes, ‘Hi’. You’d think having read all the press reports on the way I’d been ripped apart just trying to defend him, he might have said, ‘I’m sorry about all this mess, Phil’. Not a word.’
Source link
