[ad_1]
El helicopter crash that killed Kobe Bryant and his daughter Gigi the January 26, 2020, is still subject to controversy between the widow of the former Lakers player, the company that owns the aircraft in which seven other people died and Los Angeles County and its Sheriff’s department.
Vanessa Bryant decided to sue Los Angeles County after some agents will take pictures of the incident without permission and for their individual use. Now it is the county defense that has decided to fight back and has requested that the widow of the former Lakers player undergo a psychiatric examination.
Assess emotional and psychological damage
With this evidence, the county defense will attempt to prove that Vanessa suffered depression and emotional distress over the loss of her husband and daughter and not because of the leaked photos. According to USA Today the county asks for a court order to release medical records as part of his defense.
“Plaintiffs refuse to submit to independent medical examinations. The County files this motion to compel plaintiffs to take these tests, which are necessary to assess the existence, extent, and nature of the alleged emotional injuries. Plaintiffs cannot claim they are suffering from depression, anxiety, and severe emotional distress and then refuse to back up those claims. “, assures the defense of the county of Los Angeles in its statement.
Vanessa Bryant’s accusation responds
“They can’t be suffering distress from photos of the crash site they’ve never seen and that they were never publicly released. The plaintiffs are seeking tens of millions of dollars to compensate them for their alleged mental and emotional injuries. The medical examinations would help to evaluate the existence, extent and cause of his alleged damage, “concluded the statement issued by the defense attorneys.
Faced with the controversial request, Vanessa’s lawyers responded in a statement that what the county is asking is to force those affected to an examination to remember what happened: “The complaint that simply claims damages for emotional anguish does not state the mental condition of one of the parties ‘in dispute’. You don’t need an expert, and you certainly don’t need an eight-hour involuntary psychiatric exam, for a jury to assess the nature and extent of the emotional distress caused by the misconduct of the defendants. “
[ad_2]