Putin welcomes Macron to Kremlin but keeps him away with the help of a massive table 

Vladimir Putin claimed in his meeting with French president Emmanuel Macron yesterday that Russia would ‘do everything to find compromises’ over Ukraine – but again blamed the West for ongoing tensions.   

Emerging from nearly five hours of talks in the Kremlin, the two leaders – who had sat at least ten feet apart with the help of an enormous table – voiced hope that a solution could be found to the worst crisis between Russia and the West since the end of the Cold War.

Repeatedly thanking Macron for coming to Moscow, Putin said at a joint press conference that the French leader had presented several ideas worth studying.

‘A number of his ideas, proposals… are possible as a basis for further steps,’ Putin said, adding: ‘We will do everything to find compromises that suit everyone.’

He did not provide any details but said the two leaders would speak by phone after Macron meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday.

Macron said he made proposals of ‘concrete security guarantees’ and that Putin had ‘assured me of his readiness to engage’.

The French presidency said the proposals include an undertaking from both sides not to take any new military action, the launching of a new strategic dialogue and efforts to revive the Ukrainian peace process.

Putin, who was back at the Kremlin following his diplomatic foray to get support from China over the weekend during the Winter Olympics, again denied that Russia was acting aggressively, despite Western fears of a possible invasion of Ukraine after Russia amassed tens of thousands of its troops on its borders.

‘It is not us who are moving towards NATO’s borders,’ he said, in reference to alliance deployments in eastern Europe.

The meeting in Moscow came at the start of a week of intense diplomacy over the Ukraine crisis, with US President Joe Biden also hosting German Chancellor Olaf Scholz in Washington on Monday.

Biden made a categorical vow at the talks to shut down the controversial Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline from Russia to Europe if Moscow launches an invasion.

‘If Russia invades – that means tanks or troops crossing the border of Ukraine, again – then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2,’ Biden told a joint White House news conference with Scholz, following bilateral talks in the Oval Office.

‘I promise you,’ Biden said, ‘we will bring an end to it.’  

Commentators suggested that Mr Putin was trying to highlight the wide gulf between the two men as they discussed the growing crisis in the Ukraine on Monday afternoon. 

‘President Macron was kept a long away from Mr Putin, to the extent that they could only really hear each other through their headphones designed for translating,’ a French diplomatic source said.

Prior to the meeting, Moscow had already also played down expectations.

President Putin’s spokesman, Dmitri Peskov, said the situation in Ukraine was ‘too complex to expect a decisive breakthrough after just one meeting’.  

Macron’s challenge was to make sure first that things don’t get worse on the ground. Before the meeting, Macron said: ‘I don’t believe in spontaneous miracles.’

‘The security and sovereignty of Ukraine or any other European state cannot be a subject for compromise, while it is also legitimate for Russia to pose the question of its own security,’ Macron said in an interview with French newspaper Journal du Dimanche, adding he believes ‘the geopolitical objective of Russia today is clearly not Ukraine, but to clarify the rules of cohabitation with NATO and the EU.’ 

Over the weekend, he alluded to Putin’s potential strategy of mainly using the Ukraine crisis to improve Russia’s rules of cohabitation with NATO and the EU on a continent where the aftermath of World War II once set clear spheres of geopolitical influence.

Macron has said that Moscow’s arguments should be listened to. He told Putin at the beginning of their meeting that ‘dialogue is necessary because that’s the only thing that will help, in my views, to build a context of a security and stability on the European continent.’

‘Today’s discussion may be a first step,’ Macron said.

Russian military officials are worried that an invasion of Ukraine would be more costly than Putin and his inner circle realise, according to communications intercepted by the US. 

The Russians – who were described as ‘intelligence and military operatives’, some of them involved in the build-up near Ukraine’s border – also worry an attack would be more difficult than anticipated amid uncertainty over exactly what the ‘game plan’ is and how it would be executed.

American officials revealed the intel just hours after a Colonel-General Leonid Ivashov, 78 – a retired member of the Russian armed forces turned politician – issued a rare letter warning Putin against an attack on Ukraine, accusing him of whipping up an ‘artificial’ conflict to distract from his domestic problems. 

Putin has spent months massing some 135,000 troops backed by tanks and artillery on Ukraine’s borders, sparking repeated warnings from Washington that he is about to invade. The Kremlin has issued a list of security demands that the US and NATO have largely rejected, but talks remain ongoing. 

Mr Macron, who is in the midst of an election campaign, was expected to propose a renegotiation of Minsk agreements that were supposed to end a war between Russian separatists and Ukraine in the country’s east as a way out of the crisis. The new treaties would be jointly negotiated by France, Germany, Russia and Ukraine.

It comes amid Macron’s broader calls for Europe to take more responsibility for its own security, rather than relying on American forces and diplomacy to guarantee safety on the continent.  

Emmanuel Macron is in Moscow for a sit-down meeting with Vladimir Putin, becoming the latest Western leader to try and find a diplomatic route out of the Ukraine crisis

The Russian leader kept his distance from Macron throughout the meeting at the Kremlin 

Emmanuel Macron is hoping to defuse tensions over Ukraine amid fears that Russia is poised to invade the country 

Leonid Ivashov, a retired Russian general-turned-politician, penned an open letter ahead of Putin’s talks with Macron – warning him not to invade and accusing him of manufacturing a crisis to distract from his domestic issues 

A top retired Russian general has warned Vladimir Putin not to go to war with Ukraine, accusing the leader of whipping up an ‘artificial’ conflict to distract from his domestic problems. Pictured: Ukraine’s live fire exercises

The decorated general was one of the most respected and hawkish generals in the Russian MoD and was known as a hardline nationalist

‘This discussion can make a start in the direction in which we need to go, which is towards a de-escalation,’ Macron said at the start of the meeting in Moscow.

He added that he hoped to ‘avoid a war’ and ‘build elements of confidence, stability and visibility for everyone’.

‘Dialogue is necessary because that’s the only thing that will help, in my views, to build a context of a security and stability on the European continent,’ Macron said, calling the discussion a possible first step toward de-escalation.

‘I’m happy to have this opportunity to have a deep discussion on all these issues … and to start building an effective response,’ he added.

Putin, in turn, hailed France’s role in shaping European security and noted that their talks came on a day when the countries signed a friendship treaty 30 years ago.

‘I realize that we share concern about what’s going on in Europe in the security sphere,’ Putin told Macron, adding that he appreciates his efforts to help ensure ‘an equal security in Europe’ and broker a settlement.

Macron, who heads Tuesday to Ukraine, spoke by phone Sunday with U.S. President Joe Biden on ‘ongoing diplomatic and deterrence efforts,’ according to the White House. 

Putin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, described the visit as ‘very important,’ but sought to temper expectations, saying ‘the situation is too complex to expect a decisive breakthrough after just one meeting.’

He noted that ‘the atmosphere has remained tense,’ adding that the U.S. and its allies have continued to ignore Moscow’s security demands.

Meanwhile German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who has thus far largely avoided getting involved in the crisis, is to meet with Biden later Monday in Washington before traveling to Kyiv and Moscow on Feb. 14-15. 

Biden and Scholz are expected to address the Nord Stream 2 pipeline from Russia to Germany during their their first face-to-face meeting since Scholz became the head of the German government nearly two months ago.

Ahead of the visit, the White House sought to play down Germany’s refusal to supply lethal weapons to Ukraine, bolster its troops in Eastern Europe or spell out which sanctions it would support against Russia – a cautious stand that has drawn criticism abroad and inside Germany.

White House officials, who briefed reporters ahead of the meeting on the condition of anonymity, noted that Germany has been a top contributor of nonmilitary aid to Ukraine and has been supportive of the U.S. decision to bolster its troop presence in Poland and Romania to demonstrate its commitment to NATO.

German Defense Minister Christine Lambrecht said Monday it will add up to 350 troops within a few days to about 500 already a part of a NATO battlegroup in Lithuania. ‘With this, we are strengthening our contribution to forces on NATO’s eastern flank and sending a very clear signal of unity to our allies,’ she said.

Britain said it was sending 350 troops to Poland to bolster NATO forces, joining 100 Royal Engineers already there.

Biden already has deployed additional U.S. troops to Poland, Romania and Germany, and a few dozen elite U.S troops and equipment landed Sunday in southeastern Poland near the border with Ukraine, with hundreds more infantry troops of the 82nd Airborne Division set to arrive.

Ivashov, who is active in politics as the chairman of the All-Russian Officers’ Assembly, previously served as Putin’s chief of military cooperation in the Ministry of Defence.

In an open letter on the assembly’s website he said he fears Russia will become a ‘pariah of the world community’ if an invasion is launched, and called on Putin to resign. 

Ukrainian Special Forces posing with one of their Humvees after a shipment of US military cargo to prepare for a potential invasion

Around 80 tonnes of US arms and ammunition sits on the runway of a Ukrainian airport after being delivered from the US

U.S. soldiers disembark from a U.S. Air Force Boeing C-17A Globemaster III as they arrive at Rzeszow-Jasionka Airport in Poland

Civilians participate in a Territorial Defence unit training session in Obukhiv, Ukraine, as the threat of Russian invasion grows

The decorated general, who was one of the most respected and hawkish generals in the Russian MoD and is known as a hardline nationalist who still champions the Soviet system and is close to the remains of the Communist party.

Since being fired by Putin in 2001 he has become a fierce critic of the Russian president – and has frequently called for him to resign for being too soft and protecting a corrupt elite at the expense of the public, accusing him of ‘crimes against Russia’.

His latest intervention shows that there is at least some opposition to a war with Ukraine within Russia, and comes after a petition was signed by 5,000 citizens demanding Putin call off the conflict.

Ivashov said: ‘As for external threats, they are certainly present. But, according to our expert assessment, they are not currently critical, directly threatening the existence of Russian statehood and its vital interests.’

Commenting on the letter, Stanford Russia expert Michael McFaul, who previously served as the US ambassador to Russia, said: ‘This is a big deal. At one time, General Ivashov was one of the most respected (and hawkish) leaders in the Russian MOD. 

‘Russian generals don’t usually get involved in public policy debates, especially ones like Ivashov.’

The All-Russian Officers’ Assembly is an independent group established in 2003 discusses the role of the Russian military in the state, and is considered a retirement home for former officers with often nationalist views.

In his letter, Ivashov argues that Ukraine has a right to self-defence as an independent nation, and the international backlash to the annexation of Crimea ‘convincingly shows the failure of Russian foreign policy’.

He continued: ‘Attempts to ‘love’ the Russian Federation and its leadership through an ultimatum and threats of the use of force are senseless and extremely dangerous. 

‘The use of military force against Ukraine, firstly, will call into question the existence of Russia itself as a state; secondly, it will forever make Russians and Ukrainians mortal enemies. 

‘Thirdly, there will be tens of thousands of dead young, healthy men on one side and on the other, which will certainly affect the future demographic situation in our dying countries. 

‘On the battlefield, if this happens, Russian troops will face not only Ukrainian military personnel, among whom there will be many Russian guys, but also military personnel and equipment from many NATO countries, and the member states of the alliance will be obliged to declare war on Russia.’

Ivashov added that such an invasion would ‘threaten peace and international security’ and would result in heavy sanctions for Russia.

He said: ‘The president and the government, the Ministry of Defense cannot fail to understand such consequences, they are not so stupid.’

The hardline general then questions why would Putin risk such hostility and conflict, concluding that it is a distraction from the country’s internal problems.

He said: ‘In our opinion, the country’s leadership, realising that it is not capable of leading the country out of the systemic crisis which can lead to an uprising of the people and a change of power in the country, with the support of the oligarchy, corrupt bureaucrats, state media and security forces, decided to activate the political line for the final destruction Russian statehood and the extermination of the country’s indigenous population.

‘And war is the means that will solve this problem in order to retain its anti-national power for a while and preserve the wealth stolen from the people. We cannot suggest any other explanation.’

The remarks come as Putin prepares for talks today with Macron who flew to Moscow in a bid to deescalate the tensions which are threatening an imminent war.

Russia has denied any plans to attack its neighbor, but is urging the US and its allies to bar Ukraine and other ex-Soviet nations from joining NATO, halt weapons deployments there and roll back NATO forces from Eastern Europe. 

Washington and NATO have rejected the demands. 

Macron, who is set to meet in the Kremlin with Russian President Vladimir Putin before visiting Ukraine Tuesday, said last week that his priority is ‘dialogue with Russia and de-escalation’.

The general argues that Ukraine has a right to self-defence as an independent nation, pictured carrying out live-fire exercises

US intelligence officials have warned of Russia being ’70 per cent ready’ to invade Ukraine and an intelligence report indicates Russia would be able to overrun Ukraine in just two days

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz speaks to reporters during an overnight flight to Washington to meet with U.S. President Joe Biden for talks on Russia

A C-17 transport plane is prepared at Fort Bragg for deployment to Eastern Europe with members of the 82nd Airborne Division amid escalating tensions between Ukraine and Russia

The US suggested in letters that Russian inspectors can gain access to NATO bases in Romania and Poland (pictured above) to guarantee that no Tomahawk missiles are being stationed there. Comes as Pentagon announces 2,000 troops in the U.S. will deploy to Poland and Germany and another 1,000 will head to Romania from their base in Germany

US intelligence analysis concluded that the likelihood of a diplomatic resolution of the crisis appears to be increasingly slim

Colonel-General Ivashov’s letter in full 

Ivashov was a top Russian general who served under Putin

Address of the All-Russian Officers’ Assembly, to the President and citizens of the Russian Federation

Today humanity lives in anticipation of war. And war is the inevitable loss of life, destruction, suffering of large masses of people, the destruction of the usual way of life, the violation of the vital systems of states and peoples. A big war is a huge tragedy, someone’s serious crime. It so happened that Russia was at the center of this impending catastrophe. And, perhaps, this is the first time in its history.

Previously, Russia (USSR) waged forced (just) wars, and, as a rule, when there was no other way out, when the vital interests of the state and society were threatened.

And what threatens the existence of Russia itself today, and are there such threats? It can be argued that there is indeed a threat – the country is on the verge of completing its history. All vital areas, including demography, are steadily degrading, and the rate of population extinction is breaking world records. And degradation is systemic in nature, and in any complex system, the destruction of one of the elements can lead to the collapse of the entire system.

And this, in our opinion, is the main threat to the Russian Federation. But this is a threat of an internal nature, emanating from the model of the state, the quality of power and the state of society. And the reasons for its formation are internal: the unviability of the state model, the complete incapacity and lack of professionalism of the system of power and administration, the passivity and disorganization of society. In this state, any country does not live long.

As for external threats, they are certainly present. But, according to our expert assessment, they are not currently critical, directly threatening the existence of Russian statehood, its vital interests. On the whole, strategic stability is maintained, nuclear weapons are under reliable control, NATO forces are not building up, and they are not showing threatening activity.

Therefore, the situation that is being whipped up around Ukraine is, first of all, artificial, mercenary in nature for some internal forces, including the Russian Federation. As a result of the collapse of the USSR, in which Russia (Yeltsin) took a decisive part, Ukraine became an independent state, a member of the UN, and in accordance with Art. 51 of the UN Charter has the right to individual and collective defence.

The leadership of the Russian Federation has not yet recognized the results of the referendum on the independence of the DPR and LPR, while at the official level more than once, including during the Minsk negotiation process, emphasized the belonging of their territories and population to Ukraine.

It has also been said more than once at a high level about the desire to maintain normal relations with Kiev, without singling out special relations with the DPR and LPR.

The issue of the genocide perpetrated by Kiev in the south-eastern regions was not raised either in the UN or in the OSCE. Naturally, in order for Ukraine to remain a friendly neighbor for Russia, it was necessary for it to demonstrate the attractiveness of the Russian model of the state and the system of power.

But the Russian Federation did not become one, its development model and foreign policy mechanism of international cooperation repel almost all neighbors, and not only.

The acquisition of Crimea and Sevastopol by Russia and their non-recognition as Russian by the international community (and, therefore, the overwhelming number of states in the world still consider them to belong to Ukraine) convincingly shows the failure of Russian foreign policy, and the unattractiveness of domestic.

Attempts to ‘love’ the Russian Federation and its leadership through an ultimatum and threats of the use of force are senseless and extremely dangerous.

The use of military force against Ukraine, firstly, will call into question the existence of Russia itself as a state; secondly, it will forever make Russians and Ukrainians mortal enemies. Thirdly, there will be thousands (tens of thousands) of dead young, healthy guys on one side and on the other, which will certainly affect the future demographic situation in our dying countries. On the battlefield, if this happens, Russian troops will face not only Ukrainian military personnel, among whom there will be many Russian guys, but also military personnel and equipment from many NATO countries, and the member states of the alliance will be obliged to declare war on Russia.

President of the Republic of Turkey R. Erdogan clearly stated which side Turkey would fight on. And it can be assumed that two Turkish field armies and a fleet will be ordered to ‘liberate’ the Crimea and Sevastopol and possibly invade the Caucasus.

In addition, Russia will definitely be included in the category of countries that threaten peace and international security, will be subject to the heaviest sanctions, will turn into a pariah of the world community, and will probably be deprived of the status of an independent state.

The president and the government, the Ministry of Defense cannot fail to understand such consequences, they are not so stupid.

The question arises: what are the true goals of provoking tension on the brink of war, and the possible unleashing of large-scale hostilities? And that there will be, says the number and combat composition of the groupings of troops formed by the parties – no less than one hundred thousand servicemen from each side. Russia, exposing the eastern borders, is transferring formations to the borders of Ukraine.

In our opinion, the country’s leadership, realizing that it is not capable of leading the country out of the systemic crisis, and this can lead to an uprising of the people and a change of power in the country, with the support of the oligarchy, corrupt officials, lured media and security forces, decided to activate the political line for the final destruction Russian statehood and the extermination of the indigenous population of the country.

And war is the means that will solve this problem in order to retain its anti-national power for a while and preserve the wealth stolen from the people. We cannot suggest any other explanation.

From the President of the Russian Federation, we are officers of Russia, we demand to abandon the criminal policy of provoking a war in which the Russian Federation will find itself alone against the united forces of the West, to create conditions for the implementation of Art. 3 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and resign.

We appeal to all retired and retired military personnel, citizens of Russia with a recommendation to be vigilant, organized, support the demands of the Council of the All-Russian Officers’ Assembly, actively oppose propaganda and unleashing a war, and prevent an internal civil conflict with the use of military force.

Chairman of the All-Russian Officers’ Assembly Colonel-General Ivashov L.G.

Before heading to Moscow, Macron had a call with US President Joe Biden in which they discussed ‘ongoing diplomatic and deterrence efforts in response to Russia’s continued military build-up on Ukraine’s borders, and affirmed their support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity’.  

In an interview with French newspaper Journal du Dimanche published on Sunday, Macron said that ‘we won’t get unilateral gestures but it is indispensable to prevent a degradation of the situation before building confidence gestures and mechanisms’.

‘The geopolitical objective of Russia today is clearly not Ukraine, but to clarify the rules of cohabitation with NATO and the EU,’ Macron said. 

‘The security and sovereignty of Ukraine or any other European state cannot be a subject for compromise, while it is also legitimate for Russia to pose the question of its own security.’ 

US officials have confirmed that Russia has already assembled at least 70 per cent of the military firepower it likely intends to have in place by mid-month to give Putin the option of launching a full-scale invasion.

‘If war breaks out, it will come at an enormous human cost to Ukraine, but we believe that based on our preparations and our response, it will come at a strategic cost to Russia as well,’ national security adviser Jake Sullivan said.

Sullivan did not directly address reports that the White House has briefed lawmakers that a full Russian invasion could lead to the quick capture of Kyiv and potentially result in as many as 50,000 casualties as he made appearances on a trio of Sunday talk shows.

US officials, who discussed internal assessments of the Russian buildup on the condition that they not be identified, sketched out a series of indicators suggesting that Putin intends to start an invasion in the coming weeks, although the size and scale are unclear. 

Russia would be able to overrun Ukraine in just two days in an invasion that could kill 50,000 civilians, according to US intelligence

Civilians participate in a Territorial Defence unit session to receive basic combat and survival training

They stressed that a diplomatic solution appears to remain possible.

Officials pointed to the fact that Russia’s strategic nuclear forces that usually is held each fall was rescheduled for mid-February to March. 

That coincides with what officials see as the most likely window for invasion. 

Last week, Biden administration officials said that intelligence findings showed that the Kremlin had worked up an elaborate plot to fabricate an attack by Ukrainian forces that Russia could use as a pretext to take military action against its neighbor.

Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said Thursday that the scheme included production of a graphic propaganda video that would show staged explosions and use corpses and actors depicting grieving mourners.

‘It could happen as soon as tomorrow or it could take some weeks yet,’ Sullivan said. He added that Putin ‘has put himself in a position with military deployments to be able to act aggressively against Ukraine at any time now.’

Sullivan said that the administration held on to hope that the Russians would move to de-escalate the situation through diplomacy.

Ukraine is holding military exercises in Chernobyl, with troops firing at abandoned buildings and launching grenades in the deserted exclusion zone as Russian troops continue to amass on the border

Western intelligence assessments also believe Kyiv’s government would fall within that timeframe, and lead to a humanitarian crisis involving around 5million refugees. (Pictured: Military helicopters take part in the Belarusian and Russian joint military drills at Brestsky firing range on Friday)

‘The key thing is that the United States needs to be and is prepared for any of those contingencies and in lockstep with our allies and partners,’ Sullivan said. ‘We have reinforced and reassured our allies on the eastern flank.’ 

It comes as Germany was accused of being ‘missing in action’ by allies as international tensions continue to mount over Russia’s military build-up on the Ukrainian border.

While other NATO members deploy battlegroups, send tactical supplies and offer more vocal support, the Germans have appeared to draw a line in the sand and refused to offer tangible support.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz will travel to the White House next week to reassure Americans that his country stands alongside the United States and other NATO partners in opposing any Russian aggression against Ukraine. 

Scholz has said that Moscow would pay a ‘high price’ in the event of an attack, but has so far failed to supply lethal weapons to Ukraine, bolster its troop numbers in the region or elaborate on any planned sanctions he would take against Vladimir Putin.  

‘The Germans are right now missing in action. They are doing far less than they need to do,’ Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat and member of the Armed Services Committee, recently told an audience of Ukrainian Americans in his state, Connecticut.

Western intelligence assessments believe Kyiv’s government could fall within two days of an invasion and lead to a humanitarian crisis involving around 5million refugees and more than 50,000 civilian casualties.

Germany’s Defence Minister Christine Lambrecht again ruled out supplying Kyiv with arms, after Ukraine’s embassy in Germany sent a list with specific requests to the foreign and defence ministries in Berlin.

The list included missile defence systems, tools for electronic warfare, night vision goggles, digital radios, radar stations and military ambulances – equipment which, in part, is already in short supply.

Referring to an earlier build-up last year, one European official – speaking on condition of anonymity – told the Washington Post: ‘Our worry would be that you don’t park battle groups… on the border of another country twice and do nothing. 

‘I think that’s the real fear that I have. [Putin’s] now put them all out there. If he does nothing again… what does that say to the wider international community about the might of Russia?’ 

German media reports said Mr Putin – who objects to the idea of the Ukraine being admitted as a Nato member – had a three-step plan to bring Ukraine under a new ‘union state’ including Russia and Belarus, with Moscow as the centre of control.

The report, attributed by the Bild newspaper to a foreign secret service source, said Ukrainian activists will be rounded up and put into camps once a pro-Russian government had been installed. 

Putin has continued to deny plans to attack Ukraine but urged the US and its allies to provide a binding pledge that they do not accept the former Soviet state into NATO or deploy offensive weapons. (Above, ground attack aircraft at Luninets airfield in Belarus on Friday)

It warned that an invasion was currently ‘the most likely scenario’ – adding that it could happen as early as this month as temperatures plummet and allow heavy ordnance and machinery to more easily traverse Ukrainian territory.

In recent months, Russia has conducted a series of joint drills with Belarus and repeatedly sent its nuclear-capable long-range bombers to patrol the skies over its neighbour, which borders Nato members Poland, Lithuania and Latvia.

Belarus’ authoritarian leader Alexander Lukashenko, who has increasingly relied on the Kremlin’s political and financial support amid bruising Western sanctions triggered by his crackdown on domestic protests, has called for closer defence ties with Moscow and recently offered to host Russian nuclear weapons.

As war fears mounted, Ukrainian authorities launched a series of drills for civilians to prepare for a possible Russian invasion. 

It comes as US military and intelligence officials believe Russia is set to run a major nuclear weapons exercise in the coming weeks as a warning to Nato not to intervene in the event of Putin invading Ukraine, the Financial Times reported. 

General Mark Milley, chair of the joint chiefs, and Avril Haines, director of national intelligence, said on Thursday that Putin was planning to begin the exercises in mid-February, according to a Congressional aide. 

Russia usually holds its annual nuclear exercises in the autumn but the US believes Putin has decided to hold them earlier this year as a show of strength.  

Meanwhile, NATO has warned that Russia is massing nuclear-capable missiles along with 30,000 troops in Belarus.

Jens Stoltenberg, NATO general secretary, said earlier this week that Russia has already deployed thousands of troops including Spetsnaz special forces, along with Iskander missiles that can be tipped with nukes, fighter jets, and S-400 anti-aircraft systems.