- California Proposition 26 would permit for particular styles of sports betting on Indigenous American lands.
- Mark Macarro, chairman of Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians, argues that citizens are entitled to “highly controlled” and “harmless” gambling.
- Kyle Kirkland, president of the California Gaming Affiliation, argues the proposition would make a tribal on line casino monopoly.
A “yes” on California’s Proposition 26 would legalize particular styles of gambling on Indigenous American lands.
Ballot evaluate facts
Recognised as the Legalize Sports Betting on American Indian Lands Initiative, Proposition 26 would legalize particular forms of in-man or woman gambling that are currently not permitted — together with sports activities betting, roulette, and dice games — on tribal lands and racetracks, according to the state’s Legislative Analyst Office.
Money earned via Proposition 26 would originally go to colleges and the remainder to California’s discretionary fund, psychological wellness study, and gambling guidelines.
It is various from Proposition 27, an additional sporting activities-betting proposition on the ballot this tumble.
Support and opposition
Proposition 26 is sponsored by Indigenous American tribes, these types of as Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria. The campaign in help of the evaluate is becoming led by the Coalition for Secure, Dependable Gaming.
“Californians must have the alternative to take part in sports activities wagering at very regulated, protected, and expert gaming areas. We are very very pleased to see tribes from across California arrive with each other for this energy, which signifies an incremental but important phase toward providing Californians the flexibility to take part in this new action in a accountable way,” Mark Macarro, chairman of Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians, said, according to the Los Angeles Occasions.
Taxpayers In opposition to Distinctive Interest Monopolies is main the marketing campaign in opposition to the evaluate.
“This initiative does almost nothing to progress sports wagering, and in its place expands the tribal casinos’ tax-absolutely free monopoly on gaming and benefits individuals operators for prioritizing their personal wealth above general public overall health and basic safety,” Kyle Kirkland, president of the California Gaming Affiliation, claimed, in accordance to the Los Angeles Occasions.
The money race
The proposal has observed additional than $132.2 million in support contributions and far more than $43.6 million in opposition contributions, in accordance to Ballotpedia.
- California Proposition 26 would permit for particular styles of sports betting on Indigenous American lands.
- Mark Macarro, chairman of Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians, argues that citizens are entitled to “highly controlled” and “harmless” gambling.
- Kyle Kirkland, president of the California Gaming Affiliation, argues the proposition would make a tribal on line casino monopoly.
A “yes” on California’s Proposition 26 would legalize particular styles of gambling on Indigenous American lands.
Ballot evaluate facts
Recognised as the Legalize Sports Betting on American Indian Lands Initiative, Proposition 26 would legalize particular forms of in-man or woman gambling that are currently not permitted — together with sports activities betting, roulette, and dice games — on tribal lands and racetracks, according to the state’s Legislative Analyst Office.
Money earned via Proposition 26 would originally go to colleges and the remainder to California’s discretionary fund, psychological wellness study, and gambling guidelines.
It is various from Proposition 27, an additional sporting activities-betting proposition on the ballot this tumble.
Support and opposition
Proposition 26 is sponsored by Indigenous American tribes, these types of as Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria. The campaign in help of the evaluate is becoming led by the Coalition for Secure, Dependable Gaming.
“Californians must have the alternative to take part in sports activities wagering at very regulated, protected, and expert gaming areas. We are very very pleased to see tribes from across California arrive with each other for this energy, which signifies an incremental but important phase toward providing Californians the flexibility to take part in this new action in a accountable way,” Mark Macarro, chairman of Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians, said, according to the Los Angeles Occasions.
Taxpayers In opposition to Distinctive Interest Monopolies is main the marketing campaign in opposition to the evaluate.
“This initiative does almost nothing to progress sports wagering, and in its place expands the tribal casinos’ tax-absolutely free monopoly on gaming and benefits individuals operators for prioritizing their personal wealth above general public overall health and basic safety,” Kyle Kirkland, president of the California Gaming Affiliation, claimed, in accordance to the Los Angeles Occasions.
The money race
The proposal has observed additional than $132.2 million in support contributions and far more than $43.6 million in opposition contributions, in accordance to Ballotpedia.