[ad_1]
In reality, it isn’t quite a bit like that proposal. It is that proposal.
Go to the language of the laws, which handed the Home in Might with 35 Republican votes (in addition to each Democratic vote). It makes clear that the fee would have 10 members, with Democratic leaders in Congress appointing 5 individuals and Republican leaders appointing 5. The fee can be helmed by two co-chairs — one every chosen by the speaker of the Home and the Home minority chief.
As for who these members can be? Nicely, the laws is fairly particular about that too. (Bolding is mine.)
It is proper there within the invoice! No sitting members of Congress!
Comer is, to not put too high-quality some extent on this, completely and fully incorrect. He voted in opposition to a chunk of laws that might have executed precisely what he stated he wished on Wednesday!
What then explains Comer’s assertion? There are two choices:
1) He merely did not know what was within the invoice he voted in opposition to.
2) He’s taking us all for fools — assuming we will not or will not return and test the document of his vote.
Neither one is a superb look, though I suppose the primary choice is marginally higher; Comer was misinformed somewhat than malicious.
The tip outcome, nonetheless, is identical. Comer voted in opposition to a measure that might have executed precisely what he’s now saying he thinks would have been one of the simplest ways to deal with the riots of January on the Capitol.
It is staggeringly unhealthy.
[ad_2]
Source link