[ad_1]
EThis year, a card supposedly signed by Luka Doncic was sold for a staggering $ 4.6 million. However, The New York Times has published an extensive article in which the authenticity of the signature of the Mavericks guard on some cards is doubted. The world of collectors, booming after the pandemic, is agitated by the possibility that pieces of such a sought-after player do not really have a rubric made by his hand.
Comparing some cards shows an obvious change in Doncic’s signature. In some firms as Luka and in others as Lulu. The writing can change over time and stars like Michael Jordan and Patrick Mahomes modified their signatures to simplify them due to the demand they had. But some collectors are baffled by this mystery. They tracked the base’s signature, although it is virtually impossible to prove who wrote on a card.
Conspiracy theories suggest that it could be the player’s mother, Mirjam Poterbin, who calls the accusation “crazy rumor. I don’t even know how people can say things like this. She’s probably changing her writing, I don’t know. . I don’t know, “she defends herself while Doncic has refused to comment on the matter.
His manager, Bill Duffy, blames it on the stress caused by everything other than playing basketball. The point guard spends a lot of time signing autographs for fans, but he has to do it at high speed and it is impossible to repeat the same rubric every time. “He cares about one thing and one thing only, and that is winning. Frankly, everything else is a burden,” says the agent. At the beginning of the season, players often spend hours signing different products and Doncic is said to have signed at least 10,000 autographs in his rookie year alone.
Those who defend that Lulu’s signature is made by Doncic refer to a gift that he gave to the President of Slovenia and in which that signature appears. But three expert calligraphers with no ties to the sports industry could not agree on the authenticity of the signatures. One said that no determination could be made. Another, that it was unlikely that the same person wrote them. And the third, that the signatures were generally consistent. What everyone agreed on was that the autograph was very easy to forge.
[ad_2]