[ad_1]
Under the above heading, Yevgeny Krotikov wrote, in “Vzglyad”, about the lesson learned from the fate of Libya and its leader, Muammar Gaddafi.
The article stated: Ten years ago, on March 19, 2011, the first European and American bombs and missiles fell on Libya. Western intervention began in Libya and ended with the complete destruction of the country and its return to the Middle Ages.
The invasion of Libya was approved by UN Security Council Resolution 1973, which was adopted two days before the start of the intervention, on the 17th of March. At that time, Russia abstained.
It was the French with high motives who dropped the first bomb.
Gaddafi was killed on October 20, and on October 22, then NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said that the operation in Libya would be completed by the end of the month. This wasn’t just an calendar fluke.
In 2016, some of the messages of Hillary Clinton, when she was Secretary of State, were officially revealed by the US State Department. The letters say that the Libyan reserves of oil and gold were very much of Mrs. Clinton’s concern, because their purposeful use as an economic weapon could have severely damaged the exchange rate and value of the US dollar. And Colonel Gaddafi was able to.
Now we can theoretically predict what would have happened had Russia then vetoed the UN resolution that started it all. Perhaps France and the United States could have intervened from another wing. For example, the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia began without sanctions from the United Nations. There was Resolution 1199, and it only contained “calling on the parties to a ceasefire.” Then NATO itself decided what to do.
But history does not work according to “if”. The most important thing is that the lesson was learned. The main example of this is Syria, where the collapse of the country has been prevented, and the United States’ repeated attempts to organize a process similar to the Libyan one have been hindered. The unfortunate thing is that this lesson was learned too late in Libya.
The article expresses only the opinion of the newspaper or writer
[ad_2]
Source link